QS WORLDWIDE is the 2nd Annual Strategic Summit for the Advancement of University Excellence in all its Forms. QS WORLDWIDE mission is «to promote higher education in Russia and Central Asia by means of international cooperation» and «to maintain the processes that lead to worldwide recognition of the universities in Russia and Central Asia». It is held in Moscow for the first time. The founder of the global QS university ranking Mr Nunzio Quacquarelli addressed the experts: «RUDN is the most international university in Russia – it is the most appropriate place to host the QS WORLDWIDE. It is a fantastic example how to show leadership. It is is determined to change the educational market in international arena. That is all what QS is about. The main goal is to foster international cooperation partnership, to build new relations in global High Educational system, to connect the best practices of different educational systems of the world, to link motivated people together to boost international mobility».
The main issue discussed at the QS WORLDWIDE is the role of rankings in the global Higher Education system. «Functions of rankings are much wider than traditional understanding of them. We influence career of young people and change their life», - Prof James Stuart Pounder, the Chair of the QS WORLDWIDE International Academic Advisory Committee said.
RUDN Rector Vladimir Filippov noted the trends of internationalization, relevant for leading universities. «We must clearly distinguish external and internal internationalization of the university in order to ensure active international academic, scientific, entrepreneurial activities of its academics. Each Master's line of study should have a dual-degree with the leading universities of the world. Internal internationalization of universities is of special importance,» noted the Rector. The task is facilitated by English-taught programs - primarily, Master’s and LLL courses. Among the key areas of internationalization are also networking with leading universities and inviting internationally - oriented academics and researchers, as well as academic exchange.
Mandy Mok, CEO of QS Branding & Conferences by QS Asia (Singapore) underlined strengthening the positions of Russian Universities: «The most significant change in the international higher education in the last 10-15 years is the rise of Russian universities in world rankings. The perception of higher education in the world is changing and such events like QS summit help Russian universities to connect the world, and for the world — to connect Russia».
QS WORLDWIDE 2018 in RUDN featured debates on the importance of rankings in the assessment of universities
At QS WORLDWIDE 2018 in RUDN, experts debated the significance of rankings in the assessment of universities. Among key figures - Stephen Hagen, former Vice-Rector of the University of Wales in Newport (United Kingdom), his colleague Nguyen Hoi Nghia, Vice President of the Ho Chi Minh National University in Vietnam, Kadarsah Suryadi, Rector of Bandung Technological Institute (Indonesia) and Ara Akopyan, management strategy senior manager of PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Prior to the discussion, a vote was taken, which showed skeptical attitude of the audience to rankings: 41% participants did not support university rankings as a key indicator of the effectiveness of universities, while 59% were for them.
At the beginning of the debate, Stephen Hagen noted that university rankings are a real reflection of the modern world, in which consumers (in this case, education consumers) make their own choices. Universities-wise, we are talking about students and partners of universities who are guided by the efforts made by universities in various fields of their activities. And these efforts, in turn, are reflected in the rankings. In addition, Steven Hagen noted that thanks to the ranking system in many countries, for example, Kazakhstan, China, Russia and Brazil - there have been reforms in higher education, and universities have gained a certain autonomy: today, not only the state but also commercial companies. participate in financing and developing educational programs.
The key problem in assessing the performance of universities, according to Stephen Hagen, is whether the university can rank high in many categories, and whether its activities should be described by one specific metric, even complex.
Professor Hagen’s opponent, Nguyen Hoi Nghia, Vice President of the Vietnamese National University of Ho Chi Minh City argued that rankings should not be used as the only source of information about the university. Any university is a unique complex organism, which has its purpose: some are more focused on research, some - on teaching students. Therefore, professor Nghia thinks that the most important thing is the mission of the university - its purpose and goal. He claimed that such prestigious rankings as QS Rankings have a negative impact on the reputation of some small universities that do not receive huge funding and focus on their local tasks. He added that rankings also take universities away from the important component of their activities - social responsibility. Instead, higher education institutions are more focused on the quantitative indicators of the rankings (scientific publications, recruitment of international students, etc.).
A compromise position was taken by the Rector of the Bandung Institute of Technology, saying that universities are now becoming a business, and their participation in the rankings is a means of obtaining funding. But this is only one of the tools for assessing and planning the work of the university, far from being the only one. In addition, if it wasn not for rankings and exchange of experience, there would not be such events as QS Worldwide conference in RUDN. Therefore, the best practice would be a regular review of the rankings system in order to make them a more objective tool for assessing the performance of universities.
Ara Akopyan, the only representative of business, senior manager of PricewaterhouseCoopers said that the selection of indicators for the evaluation of the university should be based on its strategy. Like in commercial companies, numerical performance indicators only do not give a complete picture and can often look deceptive. According to the speaker, the best way to assess the performance of any large organization, including a university, is a combination of different approaches, where rankings are only one of many.
Representatives of many universities shared this position. Participants from Hungary and Jordan expressed the opinion that there is a significant difference between high ranking and high quality of education offered by the university. The economies of small countries cannot always provide their universities with the activity required by international rankings.
Among the shortcomings of the ranking system, the participants also named the composition of experts mainly from Western European countries that are not familiar with the specifics of national education systems and the cultural environment in emerging countries, and the fact that rankings cannot cover all aspects affecting the quality of the work of universities.
Despite different opinions, the speakers noted that though there are some shortcomings the system of university rankings is an important tool for disciplining universities. At the same time, rankings are only one of many channels for disseminating information about the university. As Professor Suryadi said, when you want to know that you are healthy, you have tests in a medical laboratory, the same is true regarding ratings and higher education institutions.
At the end of the debate the participants voted again, the number of supporters of university rankings increasing from 59% to 66%, 34% of the audience still remaining against.
QS WORLDWIDE quotes
Functions of rankings are much wider than traditional understanding of them. We influence career of young people and change their life.
We must clearly distinguish external and internal internationalization of the university in order to ensure active international academic, scientific, entrepreneurial activities of its academics. Each Master's line of study should have a dual-degree with the leading universities of the world. Internal internationalization of universities is of special importance.
One of the key tasks of the QS WORLDWIDE Summit is to motivate people from different education systems around the world to share their best practices. Such events allow identifying individual problems of universities and developing common approaches to their solution. QS wants to open more Russian universities for international relations.
RUDN is the most international university in Russia – it is the most appropriate place to host the QS WORLDWIDE. It is a fantastic example how to show leadership. It is is determined to change the educational market in international arena. That is all what QS is about. The main goal is to foster international cooperation partnership, to build new relations in global High Educational system, to connect the best practices of different educational systems of the world, to link motivated people together to boost international mobility.
The most significant change in the international higher education in the last 10-15 years is the rise of Russian universities in world rankings. The perception of higher education in the world is changing and such events like QS summit help Russian universities to connect the world, and for the world — to connect Russia.
Reputation is a part of university rankings, but the perception also plays the role in many aspects of higher education, from student and faculty recruitment to information of universities collaboration, to give just a few examples. QS WORLDWIDE writes a story of emerging higher education in Russia and Central Asia. It focuses global attention on higher education in emerging countries and in Russia in particular. And this focus is an important part of changing perception. Creating global awareness of the development in Russian higher education is a crucial step.
QS WORLDWIDE is an injection of what leads to significant changes in the system of higher education in Russia.
When Russian universities began participating in international rankings, they parted with many illusions and began to find practical solutions to move forward.
Students of a number of countries - for example, the EU, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico and China show a clear interest in Master's programs in Russian universities. In the first place they want to major in medicine, as well as architecture, aviation, programming, etc. International students ask whether the university has English-taught programs and whether it is known in the country.
Some of the most important factors in competitiveness, such as science, technologies, knowledge, talents, are all related with high quality universities, and all of these factors are organized and flowed cross national boundaries. Therefore, to increase a country’s competitiveness, building world class universities is one of the most important strategies.
At present in the world, international competitions become increasingly intense in every aspect: economic, political and cultural. In these competitions, one of the key factors for a country’s competitive advantages is its universities. Strong universities are one of major foundation for strong countries.
Vice-Rector for International Affairs of RUDN University Larisa Efremova held negotiations with representatives of Hebei University of Engineering and the International Corporation “Eurasia”. The parties came to a decision to create a joint project — the Polytechnic Institute of Hebei University of Engineering and Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.
October 14, within the framework of Russia’s chairmanship in BRICS, a meeting of the International Steering Committee of the BRICS Network University was held in the format of a videoconference at the site of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.
October 9, negotiations were held between RUDN Medical Institute and Weifang Medical University (China). RUDN University was represented in the negotiations by Alexey Abramov, Director of the Institute, Yulia Gushchina, Deputy Director for international activities and Gabriel Moshlyak, Head of the Department for interuniversity cooperation.